Je sais, c'est écrit à l'envers sur la photo, ben c'est pas grave.
Since the early nineties, the term "civilization" has undergone remarkable transformations and has assumed political and ideological functions it has not been fit for as a linchpin of the more than two-centuries-old academic discourse on "civilizations". These transformations materialized in the political-ideological formations known as the "clash of civilizations" and the "dialogue among civilizations" which comprise a "civilizational discourse" in many respects alternative to the academic one. This essay intends, firstly, to uncover the structural and thematic differences between the academic "civilizational discourse" and its trendy alternative. Secondly, the essay aspires to demonstrate how complementary, at their methodological and ideological bases, the "clash of civilizations" and the "dialogue among civilizations" are despite their highly publicized antagonism. Thirdly, the article aims at highlighting the actual political processes underway in our world which manifest themselves through and make use of the alternative "civilizational discourse" as part of their modus operandi. The essay ties these processes with the global triumph of capitalism at the closure of the twentieth century and with the rise of the projects of authoritarian hegemony.
* Quelqu'un me donnerait-il son avis personnel concernant la civilisation actuelle?
